Novartis Caught In Controversy: 'Evergreening' Tactics Target Swiss Consumers
Swiss pharma firms use patent litigation to block generics, raising drug costs and challenging affordable access.
Breaking News
Aug 31, 2024
Mrudula Kulkarni
Swiss pharmaceutical companies are infamous for using patent
litigation to block generic competitors and boost their profits. Their
strategic use of complex patent thickets enables them to keep prices high for
their blockbuster drugs. A prime example is Entresto: Novartis has initiated 25
lawsuits against 18 different pharmaceutical companies in the United States
over this heart medication. This aggressive legal approach threatens access to
affordable treatments, even in Switzerland. The Federal Council needs to
address the misuse of intellectual property rights concerning medications. As a
member of the European Patent Office, Switzerland should act to prevent the
granting of frivolous patents.
Pharmaceutical companies often safeguard new drugs with a
multitude of patents—sometimes exceeding 100. By strategically staggering these
filings, they extend the market exclusivity of a drug well beyond the 20 years
prescribed by the World Trade Organization’s TRIPS agreement. This practice,
known as “evergreening,” is a cornerstone of Big Pharma's strategy.
Switzerland, known for its high patent registration rates, proudly claims
innovation leadership. However, in the pharmaceutical industry, many of these
patents are unjustified. Rather than fostering genuine advancement, they lead
to inflated monopoly prices, placing a growing burden on patients and public
healthcare systems.
Pharmaceutical companies often engage in lengthy legal
battles to delay the market entry of generic competitors, aiming to extend the
exclusivity of their patented drugs. This tactic is prevalent in the United
States, the largest pharmaceutical market, and is also observed in India due to
its prominent generic industry. According to investigations by Public Eye,
Novartis is notably active in this strategy. Between October 2019 and October
2022, the Swiss pharmaceutical giant launched 25 lawsuits against 18 companies
in U.S. courts, claiming infringement of nine patents related to its Entresto
drug. Novartis even took legal action against the Biden administration over a
government-imposed price control on Entresto. The drug, which generated over $6
billion globally in 2023, including CHF 39 million in Switzerland, is the
highest-grossing product for Novartis, having earned more than $20 billion over
eight years.
In the U.S., India, and increasingly Switzerland, patients
who depend on essential medications like Entresto and public health budgets are
bearing the costs of pharmaceutical companies' strategies. In Switzerland,
medications account for a quarter of the compulsory health insurance spending,
with patented drugs making up 75% of that expenditure. While the U.S.
government is pushing back against Big Pharma's tactics of extending patent
exclusivity, Swiss authorities are working to further bolster the intellectual
property rights of companies like Novartis. If these efforts fall short, Swiss
policy may seek to limit the ability of low and middle-income countries, such
as India, to address these practices, as evidenced by recent trade agreements.
As a key player in the pharmaceutical sector and a member of the European
Patent Convention, Switzerland should take responsibility by advocating for
stricter patent rules and ensuring their effective enforcement.